Achievement Test
Achievement Test
Achievement tests are tools used to measure the extent to which a learner has acquired knowledge, skills, and understanding after a period of instruction or training. They assess changes in behavior in a desired direction as a result of learning.
Learning outcomes can manifest in a variety of ways and at different levels. Some examples include:
l Increasing factual knowledge, such as learning the different parts of a microscope.
l Developing understanding, such as predicting outcomes under given conditions.
l Enhancing appreciation for scientific concepts and phenomena.
While some learning outcomes are easy to measure (e.g., recall of facts), others (e.g., appreciation or values) are more abstract and thus harder to assess.
Achievement tests are a crucial component of the school evaluation programme. They help determine whether students have achieved the instructional objectives set by the curriculum.
Definitions:
Downie: “Any test that measures the attainments or accomplishments of an individual after a period of training or learning is called an achievement test.”
Good’s Dictionary of Education: “An achievement test is designed to measure a person’s knowledge, skills, understanding, etc., in a given subject taught in school.”
Achievement Tests measure the quality and quantity of learning in a particular subject after instruction. For example, a good achievement test in science would give reliable evidence of the extent to which students have achieved the instructional objectives.
Functions of Achievement Tests
l Basis for Promotion: Helps decide whether a student is ready to move to the next grade or level.
l Assessment of Entry-Level Behaviour: Assists the teacher in understanding the student's prior knowledge and skills at the beginning of a course.
l Motivational Tool: Encourages students to prepare and perform well before starting a new topic or assignment.
l Evaluation of Teaching Effectiveness: Helps determine how effectively the teacher has achieved the intended learning outcomes.
l Identification of Strengths and Weaknesses: Pinpoints the areas where a student is performing well or struggling, enabling targeted intervention.
Types of Achievement Tests in Science
Achievement tests in science can be classified into:
1. Teacher-Made Tests: These are prepared by teachers based on their classroom instruction and objectives. They are flexible, easy to prepare, and context-specific. They include:
(a) Oral Tests: Used especially in lower grades and during practical examinations. Students respond verbally in a face-to-face setting, often used during viva voce.
Advantages:
l Allows questioning across a wide range of topics.
l Misconceptions can be clarified immediately.
l Helps assess depth of understanding through follow-up questions.
Disadvantages:
l Time-consuming, especially with large classes.
l Risk of subjectivity or bias in assessment.
(b) Written Tests: These are the most common type, including objective (MCQs, fill-in-the-blanks) and subjective (short/long answer) questions.
Advantages:
l Can be administered to large groups simultaneously.
l Easier to evaluate and standardize.
Disadvantages:
l May not accurately measure practical or verbal skills.
l Limited scope for assessing higher-order thinking if poorly constructed.
(c) Practical Tests: Involve hands-on tasks or experiments. Evaluate skills in using scientific apparatus, observation, data recording, and analysis.
Advantages:
l Best suited for assessing practical and procedural knowledge.
l Encourages experiential learning.
Disadvantages:
l Requires adequate infrastructure and time.
l Evaluation may be affected by external factors (e.g., faulty apparatus).
2. Standardised Tests: These are professionally developed tests, used for broader assessment and comparison across schools or regions. They follow strict procedures for administration, scoring, and interpretation.
Advantages:
l Reliable and valid, due to standardization.
l Useful for large-scale assessments and research.
Disadvantages:
l Less flexible; may not align perfectly with local curricula.
l Expensive and time-consuming to develop and administer.
CONSTRUCTION OF AN ACHIEVEMENT TEST
Evaluation is an integral part of teaching and learning, students are observed in various situations continuously with a view to assess their level of achievement in terms of what has been expected of them. For this, classroom tests are frequently administered. These may be conducted after the completion of every unit of teaching. This enables the teacher to know the rate of progress of students as well as the extent of attainment of the objectives of learning each unit. Various steps are involved in the construction of such an achievement test.
Steps Involved in the Construction of an Achievement Test
The major steps in the construction of an achievement test include:
1. Planning of the Test
2. Preparation of a Design
3. Preparation of the Blue Print
4. Writing of Items
5. Preparation of the Scoring Key and Marking Scheme
6. Preparation of Question-wise Analysis
1. Planning of an Achievement Test
A test is meant to serve many essential and important purposes. Therefore, it should be well-planned and systematically developed. Before constructing a good achievement test, the paper setter should consider the following:
l Purpose of the Test: What the teacher intends to assess through the test – whether it is knowledge, understanding, application, attitude, creativity or process skills development.
l Learning Objectives: Identify the instructional objectives that the test is supposed to evaluate,
l Scope of Content: Determine which units or sub-units will be included in the test.
l Time and Marks Allocation: Decide the maximum time and marks for the test based on the content and complexity.
l Type of Test: Choose the appropriate type – whether it is written, oral, or performance-based.
Effective planning ensures that the test is purposeful, reliable, and valid.
2. Preparation of a Design for the Test
Once the planning is done, a test design must be prepared. After the initial planning of the achievement test, the next crucial step is to prepare a comprehensive test design. This acts as a blueprint that outlines the structure and framework of the test. It ensures systematic coverage of content, objectives, and question types, helping the test be valid, balanced, and fair.
A well-designed test enhances the reliability and effectiveness of the evaluation process.
The design should include the following components:
i. Weightage to Objectives
The objectives/domains to be tested (knowledge, understanding, application, attitude, creativity, process skill, etc.) and their relative importance should be clearly indicated in the design. Weightage to objectives is done to distribute marks across various instructional objectives such as Knowledge, Understanding, Application, Attitude, Creativity and Process Skill. It ensures that the test evaluates different cognitive levels, not just rote memory. Weightage to objectives encourages teachers to align their teaching with learning objectives. It Helps assess students' conceptual understanding, analytical abilities, and practical application of knowledge.
Weightage to Objectives
Sl. No. | Domain | Score (Out of 25) | Percentage (%) |
1 | Knowledge | 2 | 8% |
2 | Process | 9 | 36% |
3 | Attitude | 4 | 16% |
4 | Creativity | 4 | 16% |
5 | Application | 6 | 24% |
| Total | 25 | 100% |
ii. Weightage to Content
Different sub-units or content areas should be allotted appropriate weightage based on their importance and the time spent teaching them. The purpose is to allocate appropriate marks to different units or topics based on their significance and instructional time. It ensures proportional representation of content areas. Giving weightage to content prevents overemphasis on minor topics or under representation of major ones. It helps in fair assessment by giving students questions from all taught content areas.
Weightage to Content
Sl. No. | Content Areas | Marks (Out of 25) | Percentage (%) |
1 | Components of Blood | 5 | 20% |
2 | Structure and Function of the Heart | 8 | 32% |
3 | Blood Vessels (Arteries, Veins, Capillaries) | 4 | 16% |
4 | Circulation (Systemic & Pulmonary) | 5 | 20% |
5 | Lymph and its Functions | 3 | 12% |
| Total | 25 | 100% |
iii. Weightage to Form of Questions
The types of questions (objective, short answer, essay) to be used in the test and the marks assigned to each form must be planned to ensure content coverage and objectivity. Weightage to form of questions helps to specify the types of questions (e.g., objective, short answer, essay) to be used and their distribution in terms of marks. It brings variety to the question paper and caters to different learning styles, allows both lower and higher-order thinking skills to be tested and balances ease of evaluation (objective type) with depth of understanding (essay type).
Weightage to Form of Questions
Sl. No. | Form of Question | No. of Questions | Marks | Percentage (%) |
1 | Objective Type | 5 | 5 | 20% |
2 | Short Answer Type | 8 | 16 | 64% |
3 | Essay Type | 1 | 4 | 16% |
| Total | 14 | 25 | 100% |
iv. Weightage to Difficulty Level
The questions should be distributed among easy, average, and difficult categories to cater to students with different ability levels and to maintain the discriminatory power of the test. It helps
to classify and include questions of varying difficulty levels: Easy, Average, and Difficult. Giving weightage to from of questions makes the test suitable for a wider range of student abilities. It enhances the discriminatory power of the test by identifying high achievers and low performers and prevents the test from being too hard or too easy, which could distort results.
Weightage to Difficulty Level
Sl. No. | Difficulty Level | No. of Questions | Marks | Percentage (%) |
1 | Easy | 4 | 5 | 20% |
2 | Average | 7 | 14 | 56% |
3 | Difficult | 3 | 6 | 24% |
| Total | 14 | 25 | 100% |
v. Scheme of Option
Choice can be given in the test in the form of:
l External Options (e.g., answer any 5 out of 8 questions),
l Internal Options (e.g., either (a) or (b) within the same question).
Options given should be equivalent in terms of content, difficulty, and marks.
It helps to provide choices for students in certain sections or questions (external or internal options). Giving choices reduces test anxiety and allows students to play to their strengths. It ensures equity by giving equivalent questions with the same difficulty and coverage and maintains students’ confidence and improves performance.
Scheme of Options
Sl. No. | Type of Option | Description |
1 | Internal Option | One internal choice is provided in the essay-type question (1 out of 2). |
2 | External Option | No external options provided; all other questions are compulsory. |
vi. Scheme of Sections: Questions can be grouped and presented in different sections such as: Section A – Objective Type, Section B – Short Answer Type and Section C – Essay Type. This enhances clarity and helps in better organization of the test. It helps to organize the test paper into distinct sections based on question type or content. It improves readability and structure of the question paper, guides students on how to manage their time across sections and helps the examiner in organizing and evaluating the answers efficiently.
Scheme of Sections
Section | Type of Questions | Question Numbers | Total Marks |
A | Objective Type | Q1 – Q6 | 6 |
B | Short Answer Type | Q7 – Q13 | 15 |
C | Essay/Long Answer Type | Q14 (1 out of 2) | 4 |
| Total | 14 | 25 |
3. Preparation of a Blue Print
A blueprint is a three-dimensional chart showing the distribution of questions in terms of:
l Objectives/ Domains (Knowledge, Understanding, Application, Skill)
l Content Areas
l Form of Questions.
In some cases, difficulty level is added as a fourth dimension. The blueprint acts as a framework and ensures balanced representation of all areas. It helps the test constructor to prepare a test that is valid, reliable, and aligned with instructional objectives.
A blueprint is a detailed and structured plan that guides the development of a test. It is a three-dimensional matrix that ensures the alignment between instructional objectives, content areas, and the types of questions used. Blue print helps in:
l Ensures Balanced Coverage: It ensures that all areas of the content and all educational objectives are adequately represented according to their importance.
l Maintains Objectivity: By aligning questions to predefined objectives and difficulty levels, the blueprint helps maintain fairness and objectivity in testing.
l Improves Validity: It strengthens content validity by systematically linking test items to instructional goals.
l Assists in Question Paper Design: It provides a clear framework to decide the number and type of items to be prepared, ensuring consistency.
l Reduces Bias: It prevents overemphasis or neglect of certain topics or cognitive skills, reducing bias.
Supports Analysis: After the test, it can be used to analyze question distribution and improve
BLUE PRINT
Std: VIII
Unit: Circulatory System
| Objectives | Total Marks | ||||||||||||||
Knowledge | Process | Application | Attitude | Creativity | ||||||||||||
Type of Qns | O | SA | E | O | SA | E | O | SA | E | O | SA | E | O | SA | E |
|
Content Areas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Components of Blood |
|
|
| 1(1) | 1(2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1(2) |
| 5 |
Structure & Function of Heart |
|
|
|
| 1(2) |
|
|
| 1(4) |
| 1(2) |
|
|
|
| 8 |
Blood Vessels |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1(2) |
|
|
|
|
| 1(2) |
| 4 |
Circulation | 1(1) |
|
| 1(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
| 1(2) |
|
|
|
| 5 |
Lymph & its Functions | 1(1) |
|
|
| 1(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
Total Marks | 2 | 9 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 25 | ||||||||||
Note: O = Objective Type, SA = Short Answer Type. E = Essay Type
Figure inside brackets = Marks; Figure outside brackets = Number of Questions
4. Writing of Test Items
Using the blueprint as a guide, the next step is to actually write the test questions. Important considerations include:
l The number of questions from each topic.
l The form (objective/short/essay) and level of difficulty.
l Clarity and unambiguity in language.
l Coverage of all intended objectives within the time allotted.
The questions should be arranged in a logical sequence, often starting from easier (knowledge-based) to more complex (application/skill-based) items.
Guidelines for Writing Test Items
l Refer to the Blueprint: The blueprint provides the number of items, types of questions, weightage to objectives/content, difficulty levels, and forms of questions.
l Ensure Clarity and Precision: Use clear, concise, and unambiguous language. Avoid tricky or misleading wording.
l Use a Variety of Question Forms: Include objective-type (multiple choice, fill in the blanks), short answer type, and essay-type questions.
l Check Time Appropriateness: Ensure that the test can be completed within the allotted time.
l Review for Bias and Sensitivity: Avoid questions that may be culturally or socially biased.
l Pilot Testing (if possible): Try out the test with a small group to identify flaws or issues with item difficulty or clarity.
Layout of the Question Paper
Achievement Test – Biology
Standard VIII Maximum Score: 25
Time: 1 hour
Instructions to Students:
l All questions are compulsory unless internal choice is given.
l Answer each question to the point and within the word limit.
l Write neatly and legibly.
Section A: Objective Type Questions (5 Marks)
(1 mark each)
Answer the following questions:
1. Which part of the heart pumps oxygenated blood to the body?
2. The liquid component of blood is called _______.
3. Name the blood vessels that carry blood away from the heart.
4. What is the function of red blood cells?
5. Which organ filters the blood?
Section B: Short Answer Type Questions (16 Marks)
(2 marks each)
Answer the following questions briefly:
6. Differentiate between arteries and veins.
7. Define pulse and state its normal range.
8. What is the role of hemoglobin in blood?
9. Write two functions of the circulatory system.
10. What are platelets and what is their function?
11. Explain the term “double circulation” in humans.
12. Mention two ways to keep the heart healthy.
13. Name the chambers of the heart and their functions
Section C: Essay Type Question (4 Marks)
(1 question × 4 marks)
Answer any one of the following in one page:
14. Explain the structure and function of the human heart with a neat labeled diagram.
OR
15. Describe the components of blood and their functions in detail.
5. Preparation of the Scoring Key and Marking Scheme
To ensure objectivity in evaluation: Scoring Key is prepared for objective-type items, indicating the correct answers. Marking Scheme is prepared for short and essay-type questions. It includes:
l The value points or key ideas to be expected in the answers.
l The marks to be awarded for each value point.
Clear instructions should be given regarding the penalty for spelling or grammatical errors, overwriting, or incorrect answers, if applicable.
Advantages of Using a Scoring Key and Marking Scheme
l Ensures Objectivity in Scoring: Provides a fixed criterion for awarding marks, reducing bias or subjective judgement by the evaluator.
l Promotes Consistency: When multiple evaluators are involved, a well-defined scheme ensures uniformity in marking across all answer scripts.
l Increases Transparency: Clearly shows how marks are awarded, which is beneficial for both evaluators and students. It makes evaluation more accountable.
l Saves Time and Effort: With predefined value points and score distribution, evaluators can assess responses more quickly and efficiently.
l Helps Identify Errors in Questions: During the preparation of the marking scheme, issues like ambiguity or misalignment in test items can be spotted and corrected.
l Supports Feedback and Remediation: Teachers can use the marking scheme to provide structured feedback to students, pointing out specific areas for improvement.
l Facilitates Easy Tabulation and Analysis: Scoring becomes systematic, allowing quick tabulation of results and further analysis of student performance.
l Reduces Student Grievances: In case of revaluation or disputes, a clear marking scheme justifies the marks awarded and supports fair resolution.
Scoring Key and Marking Scheme
Scoring Key: Objective Type Questions (1 mark each × 5 = 5 marks)
Qn. No. | Answer Key | Marks |
1 | Left ventricle | 1 |
2 | Plasma | 1 |
3 | Arteries | 1 |
4 | Transport oxygen | 1 |
5 | Kidneys | 1 |
Scoring Method: Award 1 mark for each correct answer, No partial marks for incomplete or incorrect answers.
Marking Scheme: Short Answer Type Questions (2 marks each × 6 = 12 marks)
Qn. No. | Value Points | Marks |
6 | Any two correct differences between arteries and veins | 2 |
7 | Definition of pulse (1 mark), normal range (1 mark) | 2 |
8 | Function of hemoglobin: carries oxygen from lungs to tissues (2 marks) | 2 |
9 | Any two correct functions: e.g., transport, protection, regulation (1 mark each) | 2 |
10 | Definition of platelets (1 mark), their role in clotting (1 mark) | 2 |
11 | Meaning of double circulation (1 mark), pathway description (1 mark) | 2 |
12 | Any two correct ways (e.g., exercise, healthy diet) – 1 mark each | 2 |
13 | Naming all 4 chambers (1 mark), function of each (1 mark) | 2 |
Scoring Method: Award 1 mark for each correct value point, Partial marks allowed if student attempts partially correct points, If more than 6 questions are answered, evaluate only the first 6 attempted.
6. Preparation of Question-wise Analysis
This involves creating a table that lists out each question in terms of:
l Content Area
l Objective Tested, Specific Objectives
l Type/Form of Question
l Difficulty Level
l Marks Assigned
l Estimated Time Required
This final step helps to ensure that all elements of the design and blueprint have been implemented correctly and that the test is comprehensive and balanced. Any issues detected at this stage should be corrected before finalizing the test.
Question-wise Analysis Table
Qn. No. | Content Area | Domain | Specific Objective | Type of Question | Difficulty Level | Time Required (min) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comments
Post a Comment